Dono if you watched it there or the website I linked, as I was popping over to say the video's on Youtube now, so it's properly linked in the article I posted XD
Double post: http://www.gameinformer.com/themes/...e-games-of-e3-2017&GroupKeys=&PostPageIndex=2 My Boyfriend said that Game Informer had an article on Indivisible (and Bloodstained) in the current Mag, and I found this article. I can't seem to access the mag for some reason, but I hope someone can confirm it ^_^ would be the second time Indiv would of appeared in GI's mag.
Happened to have a copy of the latest one in my house. It basically talks about how the game works, nothing new if you weren't aware of it. Last paragraph is this though: "Lab Zero's creative concepts and gorgeous hand-knit animations won us over after only a few minutes. Lab Zero hopes to polish the game up more before it's 2018 debut, but Indivisible is already shining bright on our release calendar."
A nice little article by Keengamer! Following AX. Mostly really positive review except for that bit i didnt understand :x I don't really get what the reviewer means here. You can still choose what weapon Ajna can use in battle right? Were some features locked or was the reviewer too dense to notice or ask. And this interview from hardcoregamer from two weeks ago that i should have posted here i guess.
That entire complaint is about how stuff in the game isn't in the game, yeah. Which is weird too, I guess I don't know exactly what the person played but when Mike was showing stuff a huge thing appeared saying "YOU GOT THE BOW PRESS R1 TO USE THE BOW" so I would have thought that stuff would be in the backer build, and the person certainly could have asked literally anyone at the booth and be corrected.
I think people have just been posting interviews and press stuff in the main Indivisible thread at this point, I'd say just try and have more upkeep for this one if you want a media coverage thread. I guess the OP is specifically campaign coverage though, so a new one for newer coverage might not be a bad idea.
Since a lot of these videos and articles are still related to the game's progress, I say just keep it all here until the game comes out. Here's an interview with Peter I saw last month, for anyone that didn't catch it. He talks about the campaign experience as well as some newer lore and development bits. https://www.pcpowerplay.com.au/feature/interview-the-third-eyes-peter-bartholow,476162
I guess here's an updated video "review" for the backer build by me. Edit: Also can prob paw the Youtubers listed here to see if they've uploaded their thoughts. Checked out one and he's uploaded a new video. edit 2: Watching a couple is making me realize I didn't mention the "no fucks given" slide T~T edit 3: AND I forgot to mention the map, even though I have a recorded bit for it! Uhg I'm terrible *facedesk*
https://www.redbull.com/int-en/indie-games-in-2018 Indivisible made second place in this anticipated indie list.
There have been a lot of articles over the past week covering the final campaign total. I think it's a bit weird how so many sites are posting about the Indivisible campaign now though, after it's ended. Sure, more press about the game is a good thing, but this already looks like more coverage than there was for the actual Backer Preview release. You'd think gaming websites would have been more excited to post about, y'know, gameplay?
This is pretty stupid indeed... And quite confusing. A while ago i was getting a bit frustrated by people not bothering to check news about the game and being like "WILL THE GAME COME OUT ON SWITCH", and i feel like this is kinda similar... I don't know. I guess covering the backer preview wasn't very important for them.
Would have been nice if they did it a week prior to ending, could have made quite a difference. But hey, we got the game, the other goals, and LZ didn't disband any of those is more than enough to celebrate on their own.
Maybe someone at L0 has a friend at Siliconera, who knows. Not a practice I condone if this was the case but a bit sooner would have been great ya know? Oh well, we got the game, that's what matters I guess.
This week's Friendcast has the Zaibatsu discuss the E3 trailer at around 1 hour 18 minutes into it. Sankaku Complex has mentioned the E3 trailer as well, although some of the comments aren't that nice ...
Well some comments are just stupid. "Looks mobile-ish". Yyyyeeeeeah. Some are talking about the pantyshot incident which I can understand why actually. Didn't really appreciate that move myself back then.
I can't believe people are still pretending this is a thing, it was pretty pathetic watching that unfold, no one gave a shit or mentioned it for 6 months but when Indivisible started crowdfunding people just happened to suddenly outrage over a made up controversy for a game they clearly weren't playing since it took them that long to notice the """censorship""".
The best part is that one of the three frames that was supposed to be removed is still in the game, and it took well over a year for anyone to notice. That's how insignificant this is.
I love that trend of calling every game that doesn't look like an AAA game made with 500M bucks a mobile game... I remember some ill-informed people saying the same shit about DBFZ lol. Also yeah that sankakucomplex website looks... Eeh, very 4channish for lack of a better word.
And then you look at the bottom comment which is "how is this indie, it has a large team and so much money".
Sites like Sankaku and NicheGamer pretty much share the same crowd of devoted LabZero haters in their comments. You'll see most of the same misinformation posted between them and 4chan threads. If you ever feel like hearing a backwards interpretation of Indiegogo's extension policy, or an elaborate fanfiction about MikeZ's role with the company, just talk to one of those guys.
