Search results

If your initial IGG tier was under $30 and you paid X amount to get it to 30 or above, you'll be charged X amount. If your initial tier was at $30 or above, you won't be charged on 10/20.

Bringing this back because these people Peter mentioned will be charged on 10/20.

What, are you not ready to become a BLASTER MASTER?

http://www.capcom-unity.com/strumslinger/blog/2017/10/05/street-fighter-v-arcade-edition-coming-january-16 All the non gameplay stuff is part of the free update for current owners. If you don't have any of the characters then AE's a good buy. But you're not getting S1 and S2 characters for...

Oh, is that what you're calling your priorities now? :D

Oh, so you like to exercise on the toilet. I see, I see

Centered around a fundamental point in the universe you mean. You put the flap over or you have no soul. :T

Ah, I see now. I usually view this site on mobile so I thought you meant Shorydouken's post, not one from back in June. The game being announced for Steam and Eagle being free for people that owned the Definitive Edition were two seperate announcements, not connected. The article makes that a...

Oh, so that's the quote you were talking about? I thought maybe they'd said something ambiguous but it does say right there nothing carries over.

So what wording was it?

Nope, all they did was announce it and said more info was to come. The only thing that would be anywhere close was a bunch of people wondering if it would be cross buy but nothing official.

Ah, that was a good update video. And the only thing I'll point out is that when it comes to more options there's always a flipside to that coin. It's better for the player, sure, but that always results in more work for the developer.

That was also 5 years ago. Things can change a lot.

And the Go Go Gadget Fists.

Okay, hiding mine. Sent from my SM-G928R4 using Tapatalk

Yeah, the gameplay was pretty spotty. But I'm also not gonna sit here and get mad at somebody for poor gameplay. Hopefully it'll be in hands sooner rather than later!

The reason why I asked the question because you have to think about all the situations where you might *need* to mention being under an NDA. For example, if it's something in your line of work and you want to make sure you have a continued line of work on your resume. You can say you worked on a...

I don't know why you felt the need to clarify anything. I know what Kit meant. Why would you think I didn't? What I'm trying to say is that that's a catch 22 that doesn't make sense. All an NDA is is a set of rules about what you can't disclose. It's as general or strict as you make it. Some...

I don't know who said that but it doesn't make sense. How are you supposed to say whether you're under an NDA if you can't mention you're under an NDA?

So how much attention did you pay to the collected scrolls from Splatoon 1?