I'd at least like to be able to say GG to a good match. I don't have flawless memory to be memorizing people's names and manually searching them through psn friend search.
SG SHOULD be adding all of your opponents to your Recently Met players list, so you can find them there. That's why I decided it was okay to skip displaying info.
I know it does this on PS3 and 360, I forgot to check if it does on PS4. Tell me if it does not, and it will get fixed!
I'm not sure what you mean by "choose not to fight you"
In BBCT, it showed your opponent's fight card and name before you chose to accept the match with them.
For the people who played V-13, that meant going ENTIRE DAYS without having anyone accept a match with them. So we do not show information until after you have at least accepted.
They can see my psn in the character select screen and know it's the dude that destroyed them a match ago with filia and they usually disconnect before making it past the select screen anyway.
In SG, if you quit a match on character select after you can see who your opponent is, you are given a loss the same as if you quit during the match, so the people quitting are costing themselves rank in Ranked. It's the best we can do short of not showing their name at ALL before you fight them, but Sony/MS won't let us do that. Otherwise I'd do that.
Every fighting game has a profile viewer before and after a match
Every fighting game also doesn't have SG's tournament mode, hold-start-to-pause, a hitbox viewer in training mode, automatic framedata, etc. The "every fighting game has" argument doesn't really work. :^P
That aside, I already explained why I intentionally don't want to show anything before you ACCEPT the match at least.
No profile after, is because we're a small company and didn't have the resources to spare on a comparatively useless feature (vs say, the game itself). Same reason we don't have a Versus screen or Fight Request training mode - there simply weren't enough work hours to make those. Plus SG doesn't really keep any profile stats to speak of anyway...
Advertising would get your company paid through sales, and give us a better experience to boot. It's a win win.
This is probably true, but you
completely missed my point.
We can't pay for advertising because we can't PAY for it. So even if it would be good for SG, if it costs $35,000*, we don't HAVE $35,000 so we can't do it. See?
Good idea or not, it is virtually impossible for us to DO. We had the Indiegogo money. That's...all we had, yo. It's not that we don't want to advertise, it's that we can't.
* advertising is not cheap.