Denizen
Retired Member
Some cute FnaF doodles.
http://tgweaver.tumblr.com/tagged/five-nights-at-freddy's
http://tgweaver.tumblr.com/tagged/five-nights-at-freddy's
My theory is that the player is the one who suffers the bite.
My theory is that the player is the one who suffers the bite.
It's said over one of the phone calls that the facial recognition software had been tampered with some time prior to night 4. So me and my friends speculate that "Dave" is input into the criminal database after killing the children, and because the phone guy tells you the player to stick close to the animatronics the day you are switched over to the day shift the machines confuse you with "Dave" and one of them takes a bite out of your frontal lobe in front of families and children. We speculate that it was the Mangled who ultimately did the deed.
edit: Specifically you are told to wear your uniform and stick close to them, so it makes sense that you would be mistaken as the previous day shift guy.
We both acknowledge that the facial recognition software was tampered with so all the animatronics have to work with is "guy in employee uniform" as their basis for the killer. It stands to reason that any employee, innocent or guilty, who was near them on the day of the bite would have been killed.
We don't know if the animatronics specifially target employees prior to the murders happening though. And most jobs at kid joints like that have standard uniforms since people might get shifted to shifts any time during the day. So most likely the player, day shift guy, and phone guy all have the same type of uniform.Now, there are two major things to note about this image:
First, there is what appears to be a badge on his chest, or perhaps an 8-bit rendering of a Freddy Fazbear head. This just tells us what we already now if it's the second one; that he's an employee. But if it's a badge, then things get interesting (I think it's a badge for reasons that I'll get to in a bit). If it's a badge, then that means that Mr. Employee man holds some sort of security job, perhaps... checking cameras?
I don't know, Phone Guy seems too emotionally devastated by the news of the murders to be the killer. And there is no real reason for him to go back to a place with semi-sentient animatronics just to get more kids. I think that the animatronics have always had an awareness to themselves, hence why they could form a preference for children over adults when they think something is up. There is also the fact that Phone Guy doesn't work nights until FN@F 1 and we don't know what his position is prior to that. He could have also worked days, he could have been a store manager, or he could be from corporate.So, with all that being said, the current theory as it stands:
Phone Guy murdered five children while working a Fazbear's Family Diner and stuffed them into the suits. He got away with it completely, but something unexpected happened; the kids where brought back to life by some strange supernatural force, and there intent was revenge. He obviously had no idea about this, and so started working back at the restaurant when it reopened in '87. He was startled to find that the new bots were walking around, and grew paranoid about why. His paranoia was not helped by the fact that one day, a security guard got half of his brain bitten out by an animatronic for seemingly no reason. The place shut down again, but reopened a few years later on a tighter budget. He figured that, if he was going to kill more kids in the same way as before, now that the bots that had bitten the old guard were dead, he had nothing to fear, and took up the job a third time. He now worked nights, and bought the bullshit the company threw at him as to why he had to keep away from them. Unfortunately, his hubris became his undoing, and he was killed. Now the bots have killed another guard, another person that could have been their killer. But they have no idea if that was their killer; they never have. And so they still stalk the halls, attacking whatever poor guard that steps into that room with a uniform.
MMan7172 said:That could have very easily been a cover story, sold to make it seem like they were better than they actually were.
Like,
"The only reason our super-advanced facial recognition software failed is because someone tampered with it, not because it doesn't exist."
As for why they would tell that to an employee, well, maybe an employee that works for minimum wage, in a shit building, who could very easily go to the press, and would lose very little from the place being exposed as frauds.