bigbandpro69
EU OFFLINE FURRY
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 179
- Reaction score
- 165
- Points
- 43
- Age
- 28
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Steam
- id/arekso
I can't help but think that the entire "node" fiasco was created in the previous RQ thread, and this brings me back to my initial point. Is it worth having this thread around if people are going to attach little notes and mocking gestures to screencaps of people getting caught in the act? It brings about general unpleasantness and unnecessary drama which consequently creates a bunch of posts that moderators have to sift through.I would like to point out that during the initial rage quit thread debacle while node was compaining in the steam forums he was offered help to improve by #fukuatwerkteam and node threw the offer back in twerkteams face, called him a bully and then started labeling the entire community as a bunch of "Pedophillic Misogynist Bullying Psycho's." So he really dosent deserve the sympathy.
And back to the RQ's
Consider this: The thread consists of screencaps flagging the player as a RQer (probably with multiple cases) and nothing else. No message implying any form of personal attack, no joking. There would be no ammunition for the flagged players to forget about their behaviour and blame the people posting as "bullies or sickos or otherwise" Instead they would be left to reflect upon their own actions, which sounds like the best way to deal with the problem, to me. If they came into the thread typing obscenities aimed at the people posting, all it would take would be some effort to ignore their behaviour and the rest takes care of itself. The person would eventually calm down, and think about what they did/wrote.
Of course, this is a difficult thing to achieve, which would require tacit toleration amongst members (yeah, right) or increased moderation on the thread. I think this format would greatly improve the thread as a whole, and actually give it constructive value, instead of it being a platform for internet drama. I mean it's asking for it, really. The simpler option would be to just remove this thread altogether, which I'm sure there are people on either side of that decision. I'd ask for a poll on this and that might be met with large backlash, but it would be nice to have an idea of who wants this thread to exist, and who doesn't. There may even be an option for the thread continuing with increased moderation. Just a thought.
Up to a certain degree, we can't control how people react to something, period. I did end up nuking the original Rage-Quit thread for this very reason (Node). The general line of this thread is basically as long as you're not doing to intentionally say that this person is legitimately an awful human being for rage-quitting. They may be a bad sport ( and it is up to you to avoid them or consider them a bad sport ). I'm only letting this rock to see if we can uphold this standard.
As for the negative energy-- there is plenty of room to admit you can get steamed and be pointed to the right helpful things.
Node is also a person that I have also tried to help but has seem to legitimately ignored my input, or I failed in understanding his viewpoints and we have chosen to go our seperate ways.
Additionally, you're a cool guy and I mean not to insult you at all.
You're cool too! I like down to earth moderators on forums.
Last edited: