Are you really comparing ff6 to fuckin' Bubsy?
Really?
Really?
To be fair I'm strictly talking ports quality here (though I do ironically like bubsy, but not nearly as much as I do FFVI [2nd fav FF game just barely behind V just because I enjoyed the job mechanic better, but that's just the grindy completionist in me])
As of the my original post the FF VI port had
Sound issues (fixed)
Lag/crash on laptops (fixed)
Had to be constantly online (fixed)
Limited resolutions (not a big deal IMO, the original was 4:3 and it isn't advertising itself as HD, but if wasn't for the fact the iOS port it's based on could run on any device resolution I'd wouldn't have a problem)
Terrible mobile HUDs and UI (IMO)
Controller issues
And Aesthetic wise I'm pretty much 1:1 with what Squire has said so far, except for adding more content
to an extent. If its optional it's fine, if it's something that just gets in the way or is so tone-aly off key from the source than no.
Meanwhile Bubsy Two-Fur is an emulator with 2 games, limited resolutions, but again native 4:3 game that isn't advertising itself as HD, and no known issues to my knowledge. Just a couple of games over 2 decades old being available for sale at a decent price. (Not saying $15 bucks isn't a good price for FFVI hell I'd pay more for a version that has options for different styles [SNES style, redrawn, ect.], only if
Square would put out a working version day one instead of slapping an iOS port on a PC and saying it works.)