Well, yeah, I feel like Ravi's sitting on NeoGAF frequently anyways and that's why he posts there. Mike actually visits Skullheart but he's not very fond of stupid questions and speculations (especially when he's not able to reveal any details to cut those off) and I would assume he is quite busy with actual making of the game considering it's entering production stage now.
If you flip back and start from the beginning, you're quickly reminded that most of this thread was the "Pester Mike Thread." VP1 vs. VP2 discussion, palette swap concerns, along with pages and pages about Item Shops, and that was before the Prototype came out!
I find this tends to be a problem with "representation" in fiction in general. It's very hard to avoid making "whatever social awareness issue" come across as a "very special episode," preachy and un-fun. I've been a little concerned, but I figured there wasn't much point in bringing it up.
Hypothetical Me said:
Hypothetical Lab Zero said:
Me again said:
I haven't read the Neogaf thread, but from what I'm hearing it sounds far more like the idiotic labelling we see now where if any kid acts differently they must be autistic. I'm really not a fan of this line of thought, whether or not the character is autistic this shows more about people trying to read labels into everything than it does that character's biography, I feel. Reading Sangmu's bio, I didn't stop to consider if she had autism, it felt like a story about a reclusive child.
This is your response to a character supposedly being autistic?
I remember all that. I also remember Mike not liking it very much. And as I were saying and you actually pointed out - it was before they started to work on the game. I assume he had much more spare time that he has now.
This is your response to a character supposedly being autistic?
This feels a lot like the negative reaction to homosexual characters in games. I don't understand where lines are supposed to be drawn, but this one definitely seems wrong. We know nothing about this character other than a small bio, we know nothing about how she behaves in the game or acts as part of the story. As long as she isn't handled as "OH LOOK AT ME I'M AUTISM BUT I'M A PEOPLE TOO" there is nothing wrong with this, and I highly doubt Lab Zero's writing talent is going for that. You can have autistic characters that are people who are autistic, much like you can have gay characters that are people who are gay and there is nothing wrong with that, I will fully agree that I dislike characters who are written around one entire aspect of their existence making it appear to be their only aspect, but that can be applied to anything. That's bad writing. But I think Lab Zero is likely above that, they're a team of people with multiple backgrounds, the idea that most people here didn't even know @Ravidrath was gay but think LZ are likely to write one dimensional characters for the sake of inclusiveness astounds me.
Though if you're afraid of inclusiveness as a concept for this game, I have to ask have you seen its cast? You're talking about token handicap characters being an issue because one might be autistic, did you miss the acrobatic character with no arms?
I understand why I see some knee-jerking when certain words get thrown around in game development now, but if you think this is an issue here I'm confused as to how you think that now but didn't before, perhaps I missed it.
And for the record no part of my post was trying to imply you're homophobic, it's just easy to draw parallels with those arguments/issues in this case.
Though if you're afraid of inclusiveness as a concept for this game, I have to ask have you seen its cast? You're talking about token handicap characters being an issue because one might be autistic, did you miss the acrobatic character with no arms?
I understand why I see some knee-jerking when certain words get thrown around in game development now, but if you think this is an issue here I'm confused as to how you think that now but didn't before, perhaps I missed it.
And for the record no part of my post was trying to imply you're homophobic, it's just easy to draw parallels with those arguments/issues in this case.
"Imaginary quota" in that you're the one making it up? Like, I have no idea where you're even getting this from.
Uh... I'm not sure what you're arguing here. But that's about as relevant as how Sangmu has sand powers, and isn't just a mandala artist. Not part of my original statement at all. Not sure how this relates to Argon either.
I trust that whatever Lab Zero decides, they will write the character well enough (we'll see how well that is for 40 incarnations), and I don't agree with the zeal that Argon has taken to with this, but I don't really see how this is less relevant. Indivisible is already on track for incredible diversity.
Yeah, last July was nice. Shame that was, you know, July.
I'm not zealous. I just don't want one-dimensionality from the studio that dropped SG.I trust that whatever Lab Zero decides, they will write the character well enough (we'll see how well that is for 40 incarnations), and I don't agree with the zeal that Argon has taken to with this, but I don't really see how this is less relevant. Indivisible is already on track for incredible diversity.
Shit that I never said:
Just be cool, man, be cool.
Yup.
Ravannavar is from Ajna's nation as far as I can tell. Iron Kingdom is situated in the whole other area.
I don't think Ajna is in the same nation considering they were at war... more "continent."