What sort of no taste sack of shit doesn't agree with you?
You probably won't believe me, but I was JUST thinking about posting my dislike of the Megaman boss weakness system, but for a different reason.
Honestly I usually start off a new skyrim character by completely ignoring my map and just wandering around. I have a mod that starts you somewhere entirely random rather than making you go through the shitty helgen origin thing, and it's very random, and before I've gotten to my first town I've done at least something notable most of the time. It might be just not noticing caves or bandit camps or whatever, but I've found it's very difficult to walk around and not encounter anything at all.
Agree with some bosses, disagree with others. Sometimes it's an instant win and sometimes it's clever. I dislike it when it makes the entire boss fight unlosable or allows you to win by flailing around without bothering to dodge at all, and I hate it when the boss's weakness has absolutely no base in logic (did you know that ninjas are weak to roundhouse kicks?) but in some cases I like it. I think Megaman X does it better, though.
I like knowledge-based progression like that. Maybe not in megaman particularly, but in general it can be done very well. In particular I like how a DayZ veteran basically acts like a woodsman that licks his finger and puts it up in the air and miraculously knows exactly where to go.
Ah, so since I never played the game in a way that was completely unintended by the developers I never played the real game.
I'm not sure you've ever seen someone act like a dick, but when someone acts like a dick and then add a part at the end that says "I'm not a dick" it usually doesn't negate the part just above that where they are clearly a dick. It's saying like "no offence but..." It's never going to affect whether or not that offends someone. I mean you did very much say that they're playing the game wrong in the first sentence of your post, no amount of "but not really"'s is going to obfuscate that.
It's completely different, though. There is a big button in the menu of blazblue dedicated to multiplayer. The entire game is balanced from the ground up as a multiplayer game. Self-imposed rules are just arbitrary things you come up with to make a game harder; they are not accepted by the game, they're something you brought into the game to make it more entertaining to you.
Except in your example, rogue legacy, that is very clearly not intentional, and the devs likely designed the game around dying a lot all things considered.
See, but that still kind of sounds condescending. Like "you get the popcorn experience while I get the truly tasteful one."
This is such an unfair way to judge games.
Still waiting for the Chaos Code netplay patch to come out. :(
I'm actually interested in Chaos Code, but no netplay and no European version yet.
I completely understand what you mean, you just sounded kind of rude when you said it.
You're making the assumption that all of the parts of a game exist in a vacuum.
like, the old couple's story line will never compare to Dojima's storyline. dem Hierophant feels yo....
...except mods add to the value and quality of the game, so yeah, a mod is essentially the same thing as an add-on. I don't give a shit where it came from if it's new high quality content. Like I said the value is a little less than free DLC simply because modding your game can be a bother if only a small one. If you can perhaps argue against that instead of smashing the caps lock button and making big text to show that I've ruffled your feathers, maybe we could have a discussion about it.
so by your logic, all companies should say "hey, look at this guy who made our game better by himself without any budget and only his free time that we couldn't be bothered to do ourselves!"
