It's kind of funny seeing that kind of argument on this forum.
How????
It is like when you have characters of one ethnicity. Would you rather have a ton of white females or a a group of people all from different contries and cultures with different genders? I don't want all of the characters to have the same basic traits.
I'm cool with a male or two and I fine with an all female cast, butI can only imagine the bs criticisms that would come with a male giraffe: "Why is the only male a walking phallic symbol?!?!; "It'so sexist that a male stands above the rest, ugh!"; "Ugh, I'm so tired of people pushing males in every game, like, really!"
I'm sure most people like diversity, but shoehorning it in is, at least to me, an insult. It's like a film with a token black guy (I'm black), but he's only there for show. Or a film with a huge, diverse cast that ends up sucking because the characters aren't given enough time to develop. And, to me, it's even worse if an unharmful idea is changed just to make a few overly sensitive people feel better: "Oh, no six women have gathered together without a male. I'm now sickened and uncomfortable........also the boy scouts and girl scouts are sexist". To put it bluntly, there's nothing wrong with wanting to identify with a character's gender, but when gender alone puts people off then it's those people who are the problem. I'm not saying you're one of them. You've been fairly reasonable, but it seems like the majority of people who are against a gender disparity are.Well some people like characters based on how much of that character they find relatable. Is it wrong to identify with male characters over female ones? I know they're still catering to the MLP community and what not, but two male characters out of the bunch wouldn't have sent them into a frenzy. Or at the very least had the Goat character be male. I've seen enough stallion oc's to know people don't mind male characters in their mlp. As it stands, they just really wanted to reskin FIM, keeping the same personalities and genders. I feel they could have differentiated more, but chose to play it safe.
I'm fine with a disparity between genders but the absence of either, I'm not particularly a fan of. Sure it's a trivial to some but not everybody see's it that way.
I believe in diversity where it matters and makes sense. In street fighter, which is an internationally acclaimed game, yes diversity is important because the game is representing world warriors.
HOW THE FUCK IS THAT RELEVENT.
We've got the race diversity but not the gender diversity. It would just be nice if we have one male instead of all of the females.HOW THE FUCK IS THAT RELEVENT.
Like, I just edited my thing so I'll repost it.
Rather, I mean how is it not diverse between a fucking reindeer, a cow, a goddamn unicorn and a dragon-horse???
I know jackshit about fighters so you might be on something with fighting styles, otherwise gender is irrelevant.
We have a plenty diverse cast imo.
Then go play literally hundreds of other games with guys in them, oh my actual fuck.
You could just mute the sound and pretend the character you're playing has a deep manly voice. That's what I had to do for most of the cutscenes in Megaman 8.
[hugs]
Hold on, because the "we have plenty of other examples of x not present" is NOT an excuse for someone to still do something.
Except it's not. Were talking about presentation that doesnt effect anything, not a mindset of hateful people.Hold on, because the "we have plenty of other examples of x not present" is NOT an excuse for someone to still do something.
We have lots of examples of people who aren't racist. Does that make it okay to be racist? No, right. A much heavier example, but equivalent.
This isn't a thing about gender equality or anything. This is just that it is nice to have some diversity in the basic traits of your characters.
I think species counts as a major basic trait...
OH MY GOD, That is the biggest load of 'false equivalency' I have ever seen.Hold on, because the "we have plenty of other examples of x not present" is NOT an excuse for someone to still do something.
We have lots of examples of people who aren't racist. Does that make it okay to be racist? No, right. A much heavier example, but equivalent.
This isn't a thing about gender equality or anything. This is just that it is nice to have some diversity in the basic traits of your characters.
This too.Except it's not. Were talking about presentation that doesnt effect anything, not a mindset of hateful people.
There are games where there are all males. There are games where there are all females. There are games with equal representation. There are games with disparate representation. That's diversity.
I think species counts as a major basic trait...
I had a problem with the cast of Skullgirls before males were released. I never said I didn't. And I still liked the game despite that, something like this isn't going to ruin the game for me.OH MY GOD, That is the biggest load of 'false equivalency' I have ever seen.
Look, you shouldn't complain about a single-sex cast, regardless. TFH is probably gonna get guys later down the line and as long as their decent, who fucking cares.
I don't get why people are complaining about an initial cast being female when they're on a forum for a game that HAD THE EXACT SAME SITUATION. I shouldn't even have to hear this, oh my actual fuck.
The game is actually way more diverse now since all of it would of been the literal example you posted earlier (White Females/Female Horses). The is only 1 and a half horse in the game now.
How is it not equivalent? I used that comparison to show that just because the majority doesn't do something, it makes it okay to do something. It applies to both cases.Except it's not. Were talking about presentation that doesnt effect anything, not a mindset of hateful people.
There are games where there are all males. There are games where there are all females. There are games with equal representation. There are games with disparate representation. That's diversity.
Then why even bring it up??? Like, at all???I had a problem with the cast of Skullgirls before males were released. I never said I didn't. And I still liked the game despite that, something like this isn't going to ruin the game for me.
The game has diverse races but it wuld be nice to have even more variation with the genders. It isn't the end of the world, no, but it would still be nice.
I....Literally just said this before, it's fucking 5am for me (probably why I'm swearing so much) But it would of been that case if it stayed as a MLP game, hell it would of been a true...well whatever the female equivalent of a sausage fest is. Now we have female of all different races.
I've mostly heard guys use that as a complaint there's no hot chicks.
MLP had male characters. I don't watch the show, but I can think of a few. Applejack (I'm pretty sure that is her name, either that or Applebuck) has a brother who I don't know the name of but have seen. I also know that on a much more important scale Twilight Sparkle has an assistant called Spike who is also male.I....Literally just said this before, it's fucking 5am for me (probably why I'm swearing so much) But it would of been that case if it stayed as a MLP game, hell it would of been a true...well whatever the female equivalent of a sausage fest is. Now we have female of all different races.
Like again, why even complain? As a MLP game it would of had even less chance of having even one guy cast but as an original property, it can have guys without repercussions, so why even complain or bring it up? It probably will eventually have guys like Skullgirls but it shouldn't be an issue like you said, if it doesn't 'ruin the game'.
.
I'm not talking about other games. I'm saying I can't play this game as a male character.
MLP had male characters. I don't watch the show, but I can think of a few. Applejack (I'm pretty sure that is her name, either that or Applebuck) has a brother who I don't know the name of but have seen. I also know that on a much more important scale Twilight Sparkle has an assistant called Spike who is also male.
It isn't an issue, but it would be beneficial, which is why I mentioned it. If I dislike x or wish something was done like y, I'm going to bring it up for the sake of conversation.
I'm not trying to sound rude or mean, or anything. All I said was I'd like for there to be a male character.
It's not equivalent because in no cases is racism a good or acceptable thing. There are, however, cases where gender disparity or absence is fine: boy scouts, girls scouts, some sports, certain rehabilitation centers, prisons, most changing rooms, lesbian phone hotlines, etc.How is it not equivalent? I used that comparison to show that just because the majority doesn't do something, it makes it okay to do something. It applies to both cases.
If I wanted to play a game with a protagonist of a certain gender, I can do that. I've got plenty of games to choose from because games are very diverse, yeah. I'm just saying it would be good if we had a guy in this game.
You're acting like I'm going to not survive if I don't get a male character. It isn't a big deal to me, it would just be nice. I can't think of any other term for it other then just "nice". I'm not uncomfortable without a male in the cast.
I pointed out in a previous post this was NOT what I meant by that comparison.
What even is the Tribute Edition? I know absolutely nothing about this project before Them's Fighting Herds. I'd assume it was some kind of demo version of Fighting Is Magic, but I didn't know that it was ever finished enough to have a playable demo for it?So other than unblockable infinites and half circle inputs, what's so bad about Tribute Edition?
I believe most of that game is just slightly reworked from the original source material even if Mane6 will never acknowledge what is there's and what isn't for legal reasons.
The guy making the 2.0 version flaked out so I guess that game is dead now.
I just love effminine characters in general so, I love this.
That's the issue. People were simply saying that it's okay to have rosters disparate in either direction or to have an equally represented roster. We then used other games as an example of overall equality between games. Then you bring up racism to say that people doing one thing doesnt make it ok. That comparison doesnt make sense because that not what everyone was talking about. If you believe that having only one gender in a game (especially one that is diverse everywhere else) is bad then you should make better comparisons, because what you're doing is comparing a harmless and morally faultless act akin to a girl-only club and comparing it racism.
As a Bridget main I would laugh so hard at that.
I've actually been wondering if they stopped out of respect for TFH or if, unbeknownst to anyone, Mane6 contacted them and "kindly" asked them to stop.
Back in July 2012, one of the QA testers for Fighting is Magic leaked the playable EVO build of the game onto the internet, giving everyone a chance to finally play the game for the first time. Yes, it was severely broken and only Applejack, Rarity, Pinkie and Twilight were playable, but it gave us a feel of how things generally worked and if not for that leak, nobody would've been able to play the game, period. (Despite whatever Mane6 has to say, I honestly think this was for the better. This is one of the only two things I will disagree with Mane6 on)
You're blowing this way out of proportion; I'm not comparing this to racism, or anything like that. Not even anything close to that.That's the issue. People were simply saying that it's okay to have rosters disparate roster in either direction or to have an equally represented roster. We then used other games as an example of overall equality between games. Then you bring up racism to say that people doing one thing doesnt make it ok. That comparison doesnt make sense because that not what everyone was talking about. If you believe that having only one gender in a game (especially one that is diverse everywhere else) is bad then you should make better comparisons, because what you're doing is comparing a harmless and morally faultless act akin to a girl-only club and comparing it racism.
Why does doing something just because other games don't do something a valid argument for doing the thing? In this case the "thing" is a cast that is all one gender, and the "not doing something" examples are games with diversity in the genders of their cast.
In this case, the example of the "thing" is racism, and the "not doing something" example are people not being racist. That is an equivalent example. So someone said that the difference is that racism is something actually wrong, and a game having no males is not wrong. That is true, but that isn't my point, once again.