• As part of the relaunch of Skullheart, ALL previous threads have been archived. You can find them at the bottom of the forum in the Archives (2021) section. The archives are locked, so please use the new forum sections to create new discussion threads.

Five Nights at Freddy's

It's nuts because two months after the one-year anniversary of the series, the fourth game will be out. Whether that's good or bad depends on the quality of the games, but I doubt very many people will argue that making four hugely popular and money making games and getting a movie deal over the course of 14 months is a little nuts.
 
Yeah, same here. Scott is a rad guy, and he makes some pretty good video games. I'm not saying that it's necessarily bad, but it's still nuts how much has gone on since release of FNaF 1.
 
I'm not gonna get too excited on this one for a number of reasons, but one of the big reasons right now is this Freddy's design.

His head is designed strangely differently. A big part of the animatronics is being scary while also having the bubbly child friendly (har har) designs. Like this one is so bizarrely sharp and straying away from that design that, to me at least, it just screaming "aboogity boogity boo". I mean I know it's literally "Nightmare Freddy" but it's almost as if it was designed by another guy.

Though I guess it might just be the angle.
 
Game Theory has covered all 3 games so far and (while missing part 2 of the recent upload) doesn't seem the phone guy is. The dude who does the videos at first thought you (the new guard) was the killer, but he changed his mind on FNAF 2's GT video. I can go unbury them if you guys want. Has some really interesting stuff in those videos
 
poor MatPat he just started his new theory videos for fnaf the day before the announcement ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
upload_2015-4-29_5-21-55.png

upload_2015-4-29_5-22-5.png
 
All his videos on the series have been so damn good though. I haven't played past FNaF1 but I love when i can spend hours reading on a wiki and speculating about a games storyline.
 
eh...... it looks goofy as hell. Spring Trap looked boring to me, but at-least he moved in a creepy way so he had that going for him. But this guy?

This guy just looks like he's going to give you some cotton candy before yelling at you that he's going to eat your face off, and then laughing telling you that it was all a joke.
 
I dunno, it's like,
part of the appeal of the fn@f1-2 designs was that they actually looked like those old creepy animatronic designs from the time period.
Springtrap and these guys, they just feel like they're trying a little too hard to be scary, so they just kinda end up looking a lot more goofy than the originals.
 
After hearing Game Theory's 3rd (part 2) video, it makes sense why SpringTrap was designed as it was. Still doesn't make any sense why SpringTrap would be going after the player though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top